Step 1 · Free, 5 minutes
Run a free automated scan
Our self-hosted scanner checks your live homepage against WCAG 2.2 AA right now — a real score and issue list, no sales call required to see it.
Scan my siteADA & WCAG
Two things are true at the same time: federal deadlines for public-sector sites are already on the calendar, and private-sector lawsuit filings over inaccessible websites hit a record volume in 2026. Neither claim needs exaggeration — the real numbers are enough.
Who has a hard date, and who doesn't
ADA Title II (state and local government) and HHS Section 504 both now carry specific compliance dates under the 2026 interim final rules, tied to entity size. Private businesses aren't bound by these particular dates — but they carry their own, separate exposure under ADA Title III, which courts have applied to commercial websites for years, with no compliance-date grace period at all: a demand letter or lawsuit can arrive any time an inaccessible site is found.
Neither federal rule requires a specific vendor, scanner, or overlay widget — both require that the actual experience delivered to assistive technology meets WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA (the version the rules name; see our plain-language primer on the homepage for the full detail). An overlay badge is not evidence of that; a documented audit and remediation trail is. See why overlays don't satisfy either rule for the long version.
For private businesses, the practical trigger usually isn't a filed lawsuit — it's a demand letter: a pre-lawsuit notice from plaintiff's counsel alleging inaccessibility and requesting remediation, often with a settlement figure attached. We've written a full demand-letter response guide if one has already landed in your inbox.
Dates reflect the 2026 interim final rules that extended both original compliance dates by one year; existing nondiscrimination and effective-communication duties continue during the extension. This is general information, not legal advice — confirm applicability with qualified counsel.
We won't quote a lawsuit statistic without naming the source — here's the one we track and report on ourselves.
UsableNet's tracking of federal and state court filings projects roughly 6,176 digital accessibility lawsuits for 2026, close to 20% more than 2025, with 79% of filings targeting e-commerce companies. We break the full report down, with a source link, in our write-up of the midyear numbers.
The concentration in e-commerce isn't random: checkout, account, and cart flows are the highest-traffic, most transaction-critical journeys on a site, and the easiest for a plaintiff's counsel to test in minutes. See industry-specific risk for ecommerce, healthcare, finance, and three more sectors.
Three steps, starting free
Step 1 · Free, 5 minutes
Our self-hosted scanner checks your live homepage against WCAG 2.2 AA right now — a real score and issue list, no sales call required to see it.
Scan my siteStep 2 · Prioritize
Not every finding is equal. We rank issues by real user impact and litigation exposure — checkout and account flows first, decorative polish last — so budget goes where it matters.
See how that's worked beforeStep 3 · Scope the work
From a single-page audit to a full corporate remediation roadmap with a VPAT/ACR, priced as a range and scoped on a short call — no engagement guarantees a specific legal outcome, but a documented, ongoing effort is the strongest position available.
See pricing & packagesThe most common reactions we hear once someone realizes a deadline or a lawsuit trend applies to them.
No — a demand letter is a pre-lawsuit notice, not a judgment. Read our full response guide first, then run the free scan above so you know exactly what's actually broken before you respond.
Almost certainly not on its own — several overlay vendors have themselves been named in lawsuits alongside their customers. See what overlays can and can't fix for the specifics.
Only if you're a state/local government entity (Title II) or an HHS financial-assistance recipient (Section 504). Private businesses fall under ADA Title III instead, which has no fixed compliance date but also no grace period — exposure is ongoing.
The two are complementary, not substitutes: we produce the technical audit, fixes, and VPAT/ACR evidence; qualified counsel advises on your specific legal exposure and any active demand or claim. We're glad to work alongside your counsel on a matter already in motion.